http://phs.psdr3.org/science/chemistry1/Smith/BondingReview.htm
http://www.bbc.co.uk/scotland/learning/bitesize/higher/chemistry/energy/bsp_rev1.shtm
Therefore, it is more appropriate to describe a bond a more polar than another, or less ionic than another based on where it falls in the bonding spectrum.
As educators, we tend to try to classify types of assessments in much the same way, labelling them as either objective assessments or subjective assessments. This is becoming more and more difficult as the variety of assessment strategies increases. Watch the following video to see some of the many creative assessment strategies available today.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PszymHlse20
It is becoming increasingly obvious that classroom assessment rarely fits neatly into predefined categories. For example, traditionally objective assessment strategies such as multiple choice questions, can also be said to have a subjective component due to cultural and geographic bias in the questions themselves. Likewise, subjective assessments such as open-ended inquiry labs often have several objective components such as the right and wrong answers to calculations. It is therefore, more appropriate to also describe assessment in terms of a spectrum, with different assessments having greater or lesser objective/subjective components.
http://www.carla.umn.edu/assessment/vac/evaluation/p_2.html
No comments:
Post a Comment